Getty Images A clinician wearing blue gloves draws surgical markings on a woman’s abdomen and waist in preparation for a cosmetic procedure, with blue privacy screens in the background.Getty Images

Dr Sayed Mia carried out a liposuction procedure he was not registered to perform, the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service heard

A plastic surgeon who performed liposuction without proper registration and lied to inspectors from the health watchdog has been suspended for 12 months.

Dr Sayed Mia, who was based at a private Harley Street clinic, also carried out gynaecomastia procedures – male breast reduction – without the necessary registration with the Care Quality Commission (CQC), a tribunal heard.

During a CQC inspection, Mia tried to flee before claiming he was a patient and giving a fake name, the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service was told.

It stopped short of striking him off the medical register, saying that his suspension – at the “upper end” of the banding – was the “most proportionate sanction”.

‘Eager to leave’

The tribunal heard that on 14 November 2023, Mia, who qualified in South Africa in 1999, had been in consultation with a patient at the central London clinic when four CQC inspectors arrived and introduced themselves.

A short while later, Mia was observed heading to the lifts with a suitcase.

The tribunal heard an inspector “intercepted” Mia, telling him the reason for the visit was “to establish if regulated activities were taking place at the clinic”, after receiving complaints from members of the public.

When asked for his name, Mia told the inspector it was “Ahmed Munda”.

Mia was said to be pressing the lift buttons “numerous times” and “appeared nervous and eager to leave”.

He told the inspector he was having a meeting about a procedure, and claimed he was a patient.

‘Deliberate disregard’

The tribunal was told a man waiting outside the consultation room interrupted and said: “He’s not a patient, he’s a doctor I’ve come to see.”

The inspector then asked Mia again if he was a doctor. He replied that he was “a doctor, but a scientist not a medical doctor” and claimed he had only worked at the clinic on that one day.

The tribunal was told Mia later apologised for giving a fake name, saying he thought the investigators were from his ex-employer and had come to intimidate him.

He also admitted to the General Medical Council that he had performed the surgeries and the information he provided to the inspectors had been untrue.

The tribunal said his failure to tell the truth “was not driven by any fear or intimidation by a previous employer but to ensure he was not implicated in a CQC investigation”.

The Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service tribunal found Mia “had failed to act honestly and with integrity and showed a deliberate disregard for professional standards”.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Explore More

Montana Looks To Regulate Prior Authorization as Patients, Providers Decry Obstacles to Care

HELENA, Mont. — When Lou and Lindsay Volpe’s son was diagnosed with a chronic bowel disease at age 11, their health insurer required constant preapproval of drugs and treatments —

Appropriate statin prescriptions increase sixfold with automated referrals

The odds of prescribing the appropriate dose of statins — a medicine used to lower “bad” cholesterol levels — increased sixfold when automated referrals were made to pharmacy services, instead

Listen: A Federal Agency Is After Workers’ Health Data, and Critics Are Alarmed

Privacy between doctors and patients is protected by law. But the Trump administration is, in effect, trying to peek into the exam room. The Office of Personnel Management is seeking