The Trump administration’s anti-regulatory approach and cost-cutting moves risk unraveling a critical system of checks and balances that helps ensure the safety of the U.S. food supply, industry experts told KFF Health News. 

An E. coli outbreak that occurred late last year — for which the investigation was concluded in February — signals how, with the FDA changes, more people could get sick with foodborne illnesses as companies and growers face less regulatory oversight and fewer consequences for selling tainted food products, according to interviews with consumer advocates, researchers, and former employees at the FDA and U.S. Department of Agriculture. 

In addition, the administration withdrew a proposed regulation to reduce the presence of salmonella in raw poultry, a plan that could have saved more than $13 million annually by preventing roughly 3,000 illnesses. It is also disbanding a Department of Justice unit that pursues civil and criminal actions against companies that sell contaminated food and is reassigning its attorneys, according to a former FDA official, a publicly posted memo from the head of the department’s criminal division, and a white paper by the law firm Gibson Dunn. 

“It’s all about destruction and not about efficiency,” said Siobhan DeLancey, who worked in the agency’s Office of Foods and Veterinary Medicine for more than 20 years before being laid off in April. “We’re going to see the effects for years. It will cost lives.” 

Officials from the Department of Health and Human Services did not comment on the record for this article but have maintained that food safety is a priority. 

Staffing cuts mean delays in publicizing deadly outbreaks, said Susan Mayne, an adjunct professor at the Yale School of Public Health who retired from the FDA in 2023. DeLancey said new requirements from the Trump administration for reviewing agency announcements became so arduous that it took weeks to get approval for alerts that should have been going out much sooner. 

The November 2024 outbreak caused by E. coli bacteria in lettuce sickened nearly 90 people and killed one person. But after the investigation was completed under the Trump administration, the FDA redacted any information identifying the grower or processor. The FDA said in its February internal summary that the grower wasn’t named because no product remained on the market. 

The information is still important because it can prevent further cases, pressure growers to improve sanitation, and identify repeat offenders, said Bill Marler, a Seattle lawyer who specializes in food-safety litigation. 

“The whole ‘Make America Healthy Again,’ the focus on taking food color dyes out of cereal?” said Chris George, of Avon, Indiana, whose son was hospitalized in the outbreak. “How about we take E. coli out of our lettuce, so it doesn’t kill our kids?”

We encourage organizations to republish our content, free of charge. Here’s what we ask:

You must credit us as the original publisher, with a hyperlink to our kffhealthnews.org site. If possible, please include the original author(s) and KFF Health News” in the byline. Please preserve the hyperlinks in the story.

It’s important to note, not everything on kffhealthnews.org is available for republishing. If a story is labeled “All Rights Reserved,” we cannot grant permission to republish that item.

Have questions? Let us know at KHNHelp@kff.org



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Explore More

Ticks Are Migrating, Raising Disease Risks if They Can’t Be Tracked Quickly Enough

Biologist Grant Hokit came to this small meadow in the mountains outside Condon, Montana, to look for ticks. A hiking path crossed the expanse of long grasses and berry bushes.

Minister starting to take women’s health seriously

Ammar Ebrahim BBC Jersey political reporter BBC Health Minister Tom Binet faced questions from a scrutiny panel Jersey’s health minister is “finally understanding the issues facing women’s health”, the head

Timing, consistency of activity linked to better fitness

Some people spring into action at dawn, while others prefer a slower start to their day. Whether you rise with a grin or a groan, scientists say your internal clock