Scientists have conducted the largest and most diverse study to date on how recessive genetic changes contribute to developmental disorders1. They found that most undiagnosed cases that are due to recessive causes are linked to genes we already know about, and suggest a shift in research focus could improve diagnosis rates.

Researchers from the Wellcome Sanger Institute and their collaborators at GeneDx analysed genetic data from nearly 30,000 families affected by developmental disorders — six times more families with greater diversity in ancestral backgrounds compared to previous work.

While discovering several genes that were previously not linked to these conditions, researchers found that known genes explain over 80 per cent of cases caused by recessive genetic variants. This is a significant increase from previous estimates2. The study also revealed the contribution of recessive genetic variants to developmental disorders varies significantly across the ethnic groups studied.

The findings, published today (23 September) in Nature Genetics, shed new light on the genetic basis of developmental disorders, and highlight the importance of considering a person’s genetic background in diagnosis and research.

The team suggests that efforts to discover recessive genes associated with these disorders in the last few years have been largely successful and that the challenge now lies more in interpreting genetic changes in known recessive genes. Using this approach could potentially be used to diagnose twice as many patients compared to focusing solely on remaining gene discovery, they say3.

Many developmental disorders, which can impact a child’s physical, intellectual, or behavioural development, have genetic origins. Some are caused by recessive genes, where a child must inherit an altered gene copy from both parents to develop the condition. They include Joubert syndrome, Bardet-Biedl syndrome and Tay-Sachs disease. Until now, overall quantification of these recessive genetic causes across diverse populations has not been done.

In this new study, researchers combined summarised data from the Deciphering Developmental Disorders (DDD) study4 and GeneDx cohorts to identify individuals with similar genetic backgrounds, totalling 29,745 families. Over 20 per cent of these families were from mostly non-European ancestries. Analysing this large dataset provided more insight, especially for smaller and less-studied groups.

The team found the number of patients affected by recessive genetic variants varied greatly between different ancestry groups, ranging from two to 19 per cent of cases. This variation is strongly linked to the prevalence of unions between close relatives — consanguinity — in these groups.

Researchers identified several genes, including KBTBD2, CRELD1 and ZDHHC16, newly associated with developmental disorders, providing answers for previously undiagnosed families. They also estimate that around 12.5 per cent of patients may have multiple genetic factors contributing to their condition, highlighting the complexity of these disorders.

Importantly, they found known genes explain about 84 per cent of cases caused by recessive genetic variants, which was similar across individuals from European and non-European ancestry groups5. This substantial increase from previous estimates suggests that the new recessive genes that have been discovered over the last few years account for a substantial fraction of previously undiagnosed patients with recessive causes. However, the scientists found that there are likely still diagnoses being missed in these known genes that involve DNA changes that are difficult to interpret3. The findings emphasise the importance of improving interpretation of harmful genetic variants in known disease-causing genes.

Dr Kartik Chundru, first author of the study, formerly at the Wellcome Sanger Institute and now University of Exeter, said: “These gene discoveries will provide answers for some previously undiagnosed families and help clinicians better understand and identify these conditions. Our study highlights the importance of reanalysing genetic data with updated methods and knowledge, as it can lead to new diagnoses for patients without needing additional samples.”

Dr Vincent Ustach, senior author of the study at GeneDx, said: “This is the most diverse group of participants ever studied to address the recessive contribution to developmental disorders, and showcases the critical impact that a diverse dataset has for delivering a more comprehensive understanding of developmental disorders across different ancestries. Findings from this study can drive more personalised and actionable results for families with affected children, and overall enhances our ability to provide answers for underrepresented populations.”

Dr Hilary Martin, senior author of the study at the Wellcome Sanger Institute, said: “One of the surprising findings from this work was that many patients with one known genetic diagnosis might actually have additional rare genetic changes contributing to their condition. Identifying these additional changes could improve our understanding of the patient’s condition, lead to more accurate diagnoses, and potentially offer new treatment options. It also highlights the complexity of genetic disorders and the need for comprehensive genetic analysis.”

Notes:

  1. Some rare disorders, such as cystic fibrosis, Tay-Sachs disease and spinal muscular atrophy, are caused by autosomal recessive genetic variants. ‘Autosomal’ means that the gene in question is located on one of the numbered, or non-sex, chromosomes. ‘Recessive’ means that two copies of the mutated gene — one from each parent — are required to cause the disorder. In a family where both parents are carriers and do not have the disease, roughly a quarter of their children will inherit two disease-causing copies and have the disease.
  2. Lower estimates of the impact of recessive variants on these disorders in known genes in 2018 reflect the success of new disease gene discoveries in the field since.

    H. Martin et al. (2018) ‘Quantifying the contribution of recessive coding variation to developmental disorders’ Science. DOI: 10.1126/science.aar6731

  3. Researchers estimated from the genetic data that there are around 280 potential diagnoses that could be made from protein-altering variants in the known genes. This is compared to an estimate of about 161 potential diagnoses that could be made from undiscovered genes.
  4. The Deciphering Developmental Disorders (DDD) study aims to advance clinical genetic practice for children with developmental disorders. Children were recruited into the study between 2010 and 2015.

    The DDD study is no longer recruiting new patients. If your child has an undiagnosed developmental disorder please speak with your paediatrician or GP about the most appropriate tests or referral into other studies.

    The DDD team is absolutely committed to analysing and re-analysing all the genomic data from families in the study over the coming five years to try to find a diagnosis for as many children as possible.

  5. This is true for both European and non-European ancestry individuals (87 per cent vs 80 per cent).

The data from the study can be accessed here: https://github.com/chundruv/DDD_GeneDx_Recessives

Funding: This research was supported by Wellcome and the National Institute for Health and Care Research Exeter Biomedical Research Centre. For full funding acknowledgements, please refer to the publication.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Before you post, please prove you are sentient.

What is 8 times 3?

Explore More

How human brain functional networks emerge and develop during the birth transition

Brain-imaging data collected from fetuses and infants has revealed a rapid surge in functional connectivity between brain regions on a global scale at birth, possibly reflecting neural processes that support

Non-recommended milk being provided to young children

More than one-third of infant caregivers reported serving at least one non-recommended milk type to their infant in the past month — most providing them daily — and the majority

Genetic mutation may identify women with difficulty producing breast milk

Leading health care organizations recommend exclusive breastfeeding for six months after birth, yet some mothers report stopping due to a perceived lack of milk supply. Penn State College of Medicine