New research comparing different approaches to dementia care for people with Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias found no significant differences in patient behavioral symptoms or caregiver strain, whether delivered through a health system, provided by a community-based organization, or as usual care over an 18-month period.

However, the Dementia Care Study, also known as D-CARE, also found that caregiver self-efficacy — a measurement of caregivers’ confidence in managing dementia-related challenges and accessing support — improved in both the health-system and community-based care approaches and was rated higher than in those receiving usual care. Higher self-efficacy was observed within 6 months of care delivery and remained consistent throughout the study.

“The D-CARE trial is the largest evaluation, to date, of different approaches to providing dementia care,” said Dr. David Reuben, Archstone Professor of Geriatrics at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA and principal investigator of the study. “Caregivers play an essential role in the lives of individuals with dementia, and their ability to manage stress and feel confident in their caregiving roles is crucial. Higher self-efficacy may lead to obtaining more resources and keeping persons with dementia in their homes.”

The study will be published on Jan. 29 in the peer-reviewed Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).

Funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute and the National Institute on Aging, the D-CARE study aimed to compare the effectiveness of two established dementia care approaches to each other and to usual care. It comprised 2,176 persons with dementia and their caregivers and was conducted from June 2019 to August 2023.

The study was led by investigators at University of California, Los Angeles, with data management and statistics performed by the Yale Data Coordinating Center and was conducted at four clinical sites: Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Baylor Scott & White Health, the University of Texas Medical Branch, and Geisinger Health. The study was supported by investigators at the Benjamin Rose Institute on Aging, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, and RAND. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups: health care system-based care delivered by Dementia Care Specialists (based on the UCLA Alzheimer’s and Dementia Care Program), community-based organization-based care delivered by Care Consultants (utilizing Benjamin Rose Institute on Aging Care Consultation Program), or usual care.

“The study’s results underscore the complexities of dementia care and the challenges in comparing dementia care models in a real-world setting, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic,” Reuben said. “Moreover, some benefits of the models may not have been fully captured in the trial’s chosen primary and secondary outcomes.” The effects of the interventions on health care utilization are still pending.

The findings from D-CARE have significant implications for healthcare systems, medical groups, community-based organizations, policymakers, and insurers working to improve dementia care. The study suggests that while health system and community-based dementia programs may not outperform routine care in reducing caregiver strain or managing patient behaviors, these programs help caregivers navigate the challenges of dementia care more effectively.

“These findings remind us that different approaches to dementia care can lead to comparable clinical outcomes and may be particularly valuable for institutions participating in the new Medicare Guiding an Improved Dementia Experience (GUIDE) program,” Reuben said. “Additional analyses of D-CARE will provide further insight into the effectiveness of health system- and community-based dementia care.”

The D-CARE study is funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCS-2017C1-6534), a nonprofit institution, and the National Institute on Aging (R01 AG061078). The awards include four clinical trial sites. Additional support was provided by the Yale Program on Aging/Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center (P30AG021342), The National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS) a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (UL1 TR000142), The Mexican Health and Aging Study (R01AG018016), The UTMB Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center (OAIC) (P30 AG024832), The Dewey and Cynthia Robertson Fund for Wake Forest Geriatrics and the Wake Forest Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center (P30 AG049638).



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Before you post, please prove you are sentient.

what is 3 + 2?

Explore More

Limiting energy in neurons exacerbates epilepsy

Epilepsy, one of the most common neurological disorders, is characterized by the spontaneous repetition of seizures caused by the hyperactivity of a group of neurons in the brain. Could we

Can this medication reverse MS? Brain biomarker shows it can

A decade after UC San Francisco scientists identified an over-the-counter antihistamine as a treatment for multiple sclerosis, researchers have developed an approach to measure the drug’s effectiveness in repairing the

New research could help identify babies at risk of brain bleeds

Researchers from WEHI (the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute) have uncovered a new way to help identify babies and foetuses at high-risk of developing brain bleeds, paving the way for